Introduction of a Simple Algorithm to Create Synthetic-computed Tomography of the Head from Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Nahid Chegeni, Mohammad Javad Tahmasebi Birgani, Fariba Farhadi Birgani, Daryoush Fatehi, Gholamreza Akbarizadeh, Marziyeh Tahmasbi

DOI: 10.4103/jmss.JMSS_26_18

Abstract


Background: Recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiotherapy has become a favorite science field for treatment planning purposes. In this study, a simple algorithm was introduced to create synthetic computed tomography (sCT) of the head from MRI. Methods: A simple atlas-based method was proposed to create sCT images based on the paired T1/T2-weighted MRI and bone/brain window CT. Dataset included 10 patients with glioblastoma multiforme and 10 patients with other brain tumors. To generate a sCT image, first each MR from dataset was registered to the target-MR, the resulting transformation was applied to the corresponding CT to create the set of deformed CTs. Then, deformed-CTs were fused to generate a single sCT image. The sCT images were compared with the real CT images using geometric measures (mean absolute error [MAE] and dice similarity coefficient of bone [DSCbone]) and Hounsfield unit gamma-index (THU) with criteria 100 HU/2 mm. Results: The evaluations carried out by MAE, DSCbone, and THU showed a good agreement between the synthetic and real CT images. The results represented the range of 78-93 HU and 0.80-0.89 for MAE and DSCbone, respectively. The THU also showed that approximately 91%-93% of pixels fulfilled the criteria 100 HU/2 mm for brain tumors. Conclusion: This method showed that MR sequence (T1w or T2w) should be selected depending on the type of tumor. In addition, the brain window synthetic CTs are in better agreement with real CT relative to bone window sCT images.


Keywords


Deformable registration; Demons algorithm; radiotherapy; synthetic computed tomography

Full Text:

PDF

References


Prabhakar R, Haresh KP, Ganesh T, Joshi RC, Julka PK, Rath GK, et al. Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance based target volume in brain tumors. J Cancer Res Ther 2007;3:121-3.

Rasch C, Steenbakkers R, van Herk M. Target definition in prostate, head, and neck. Semin Radiat Oncol 2005;15:136-45.

Roy S, Carass A, Jog A, Prince JL, Lee J, editors. MR to CT registration of brains using image synthesis. Proceedings of SPIE. International Society for Optical Enginering; 2014.

Cattaneo GM, Reni M, Rizzo G, Castellone P, Ceresoli GL, Cozzarini C, et al. Target delineation in post-operative radiotherapy of brain gliomas: Interobserver variability and impact of image registration of MR(pre-operative) images on treatment planning CT scans. Radiother Oncol 2005;75:217-23.

Ulin K, Urie MM, Cherlow JM. Results of a multi-institutional benchmark test for cranial CT/MR image registration. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;77:1584-9.

Zitova B, Flusser J. Image registration methods: A survey. Image Vis Comput 2003;21:977-1000.

Nyholm T, Nyberg M, Karlsson MG, Karlsson M. Systematisation of spatial uncertainties for comparison between a MR and a CT-based radiotherapy workflow for prostate treatments. Radiat Oncol 2009;4:54.

Dowling JA, Lambert J, Parker J, Salvado O, Fripp J, Capp A, et al. An atlas-based electron density mapping method for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-alone treatment planning and adaptive MRI-based prostate radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;83:e5-11.

Lee YK, Bollet M, Charles-Edwards G, Flower MA, Leach MO, McNair H, et al. Radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging alone. Radiother Oncol 2003;66:203-16.

Koivula L, Kapanen M, Seppälä T, Collan J, Dowling JA, Greer PB, et al. Intensity-based dual model method for generation of synthetic CT images from standard T2-weighted MR images – Generalized technique for four different MR scanners. Radiother Oncol 2017;125:411-9.

Chen S, Quan H, Qin A, Yee S, Yan D. MR image-based synthetic CT for IMRT prostate treatment planning and CBCT image-guided localization. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2016;17:236-45.

Berker Y, Franke J, Salomon A, Palmowski M, Donker HC, Temur Y, et al. MRI-based attenuation correction for hybrid PET/MRI systems: A 4-class tissue segmentation technique using a combined ultrashort-echo-time/dixon MRI sequence. J Nucl Med 2012;53:796-804.

Edmund JM, Kjer HM, Van Leemput K, Hansen RH, Andersen JA, Andreasen D, et al. Avoxel-based investigation for MRI-only radiotherapy of the brain using ultra short echo times. Phys Med Biol 2014;59:7501-19.

Rank CM, Hünemohr N, Nagel AM, Röthke MC, Jäkel O, Greilich S, et al. MRI-based simulation of treatment plans for ion radiotherapy in the brain region. Radiother Oncol 2013;109:414-8.

Johansson A, Karlsson M, Nyholm T. CT substitute derived from MRI sequences with ultrashort echo time. Med Phys 2011;38:2708-14.

Johansson A, Karlsson M, Yu J, Asklund T, Nyholm T. Voxel-wise uncertainty in CT substitute derived from MRI. Med Phys 2012;39:3283-90.

Keereman V, Fierens Y, Broux T, De Deene Y, Lonneux M, Vandenberghe S, et al. MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI using ultrashort echo time sequences. J Nucl Med 2010;51:812-8.

Sjölund J, Forsberg D, Andersson M, Knutsson H. Generating patient specific pseudo-CT of the head from MR using atlas-based regression. Phys Med Biol 2015;60:825-39.

Uh J, Merchant TE, Li Y, Li X, Hua C. MRI-based treatment planning with pseudo CT generated through atlas registration. Med Phys 2014;41:051711.

Toga AW, Thompson PM. The role of image registration in brain mapping. Image Vis Comput 2001;19:3-24.

Han X. MR-based synthetic CT generation using a deep convolutional neural network method. Med Phys 2017;44:1408-19.

Ghose S, Dowling JA, Rai R, Liney GP. Substitute CT generation from a single ultra short time echo MRI sequence: Preliminary study. Phys Med Biol 2017;62:2950-60.

Ghose S, Greer PB, Sun J, Pichler P, Rivest-Henault D, Mitra J, et al. Regression and statistical shape model based substitute CT generation for MRI alone external beam radiation therapy from standard clinical MRI sequences. Phys Med Biol 2017;62:8566-80.

Vercauteren T, Pennec X, Perchant A, Ayache N. Diffeomorphic demons: Efficient non-parametric image registration. Neuroimage 2009;45:S61-72.

Andreasen D, Van Leemput K, Hansen RH, Andersen JA, Edmund JM. Patch-based generation of a pseudo CT from conventional MRI sequences for MRI-only radiotherapy of the brain. Med Phys 2015;42:1596-605.

Edmund JM, Nyholm T. A review of substitute CT generation for MRI-only radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol 2017;12:28.

Stanescu T, Jans HS, Pervez N, Stavrev P, Fallone BG. A study on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiation treatment planning of intracranial lesions. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:3579-93.

Schreibmann E, Nye JA, Schuster DM, Martin DR, Votaw J, Fox T, et al. MR-based attenuation correction for hybrid PET-MR brain imaging systems using deformable image registration. Med Phys 2010;37:2101-9.

Kops ER, Hautzel H, Herzog H, Antoch G, Shah NJ. Comparison of template-based versus CT-based attenuation correction for hybrid MR/PET scanners. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2015;62:2115-21.

Speier C, Pileggi G, Izquierdo-Garcia D, Catana C, Sharp GC, Spadea MF, et al. Advanced multimodal methods for cranial pseudo-CT generation validated by IMRT and VMAT radiation therapy plans. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018;102:792-800.

Aouadi S, Vasic A, Paloor S, Torfeh T, McGarry M, Petric P, et al. Generation of synthetic CT using multi-scale and dual-contrast patches for brain MRI-only external beam radiotherapy. Phys Med 2017;42:174-84.

Pileggi G, Speier C, Sharp GC, Izquierdo Garcia D, Catana C, Pursley J, et al. Proton range shift analysis on brain pseudo-CT generated from T1 and T2 MR. Acta Oncol 2018;57:1521-31.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

  https://e-rasaneh.ir/Certificate/22728

https://e-rasaneh.ir/

ISSN : 2228-7477