Comparison of Acetate‑butyrate and Acetate‑ethanol Metabolic Pathway in Biohydrogen Production
DOI: 10.4103/jmss.JMSS_6_18
Abstract
fermentation is one of the biohydrogen production methods that carried out just on organic wastes
conversion. In this study, the batch tests were conducted to compare the biohydrogen production
and glucose fermentation via acetate‑butyrate and acetate‑ethanol metabolic pathway induced by
NaOH and KOH (10 M) pretreatment. In batch test, the glucose concentration in the feed was varied
from 3.75 to 15 g/L under mesophilic conditions (37°C ± 1°C). In order to sludge pretreatment,
NaOH and KOH (as an alkaline agent) was used. Batch tests showed that maximum biohydrogen
production under NaOH (2.7 ± 0.5 L) and KOH (2.2 ± 0.7 L) pretreatment was achieved at 15 g/L
of influent glucose. In the batch test, with increasing influent glucose concentration, the lower yields
of hydrogen were observed. The biohydrogen reactions had good electron closure (5.2%–13.5%) for
various glucose concentrations and pretreatments. For NaOH and KOH pretreatment, the biohydrogen
yield decreased from 2.49 to 1.63 and from 2.22 to 1.2 mol H2/mol glucose, respectively, when
glucose concentration increased from 3.75 to 15 g/L. By applying alkaline sludge pretreatment by
NaOH and KOH, the glucose fermentation was followed with acetate‑butyrate and acetate‑ethanol
metabolic pathway, respectively. The lower biohydrogen yields were observed under acetate‑ethanol
metabolic pathway and related to metabolically unfavorable for biohydrogen production.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Liu X, Ren N, Song F, Yang C, Wang A. Recent advances in fermentative biohydrogen production. Progress Nat Sci 2008;18:253-8.
Gadhe A, Sonawane SS, Varma MN. Kinetic analysis of biohydrogen production from complex dairy wastewater under optimized condition. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2014;39:1306-14.
Mathews J, Wang G. Metabolic pathway engineering for enhanced biohydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34:7404-16.
Zhu H, Beland M. Evaluation of alternative methods of preparing hydrogen producing seeds from digested wastewater sludge. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006;31:1980-8.
Boboescu IZ, Gherman VD, Mirel I, Pap B, Tengolics R, Rakhely G, et al. Simultaneous biohydrogen production and wastewater treatment based on the selective enrichment of the fermentation ecosystem. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2014;39:1502-10.
Wang J, Wan W. Comparison of different pretreatment methods for enriching hydrogen-producing bacteria from digested sludge. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008;33:2934-41.
O-Thong S, Prasertsan P, Birkeland NK. Evaluation of methods for preparing hydrogen-producing seed inocula under thermophilic condition by process performance and microbial community analysis. Bioresour Technol 2009;100:909-18.
Ren N, Xing D, Rittmann BE, Zhao L, Xie T, Zhao X, et al. Microbial community structure of ethanol type fermentation in bio-hydrogen production. Environ Microbiol 2007;9:1112-25.
Amin MM, Bina B, Taheri E, Zare MR, Ghasemian M, van Ginkel SW, et al. Metabolism and kinetic study of bioH2 production by anaerobic sludge under different acid pretreatments. Process Biochem 2017;61:24-9.
Amin MM, Bina B, Taheri E, Fatehizadeh A, Ghasemian M. Stoichiometry evaluation of biohydrogen production from various carbohydrates. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2016;23:20915-21.
Whang LM, Lin CA, Liu IC, Wu CW, Cheng HH. Metabolic and energetic aspects of biohydrogen production of clostridium tyrobutyricum: The effects of hydraulic retention time and peptone addition. Bioresour Technol 2011;102:8378-83.
Hwang MH, Jang NJ, Hyun SH, Kim IS. Anaerobic bio-hydrogen production from ethanol fermentation: The role of pH. J Biotechnol 2004;111:297-309.
Zhang K, Ren N, Guo C, Wang A, Cao G. Effects of various pretreatment methods on mixed microflora to enhance biohydrogen production from corn stover hydrolysate. J Environ Sci (China) 2011;23:1929-36.
Amin MM, Zilles JL, Greiner J, Charbonneau S, Raskin L, Morgenroth E, et al. Influence of the antibiotic erythromycin on anaerobic treatment of a pharmaceutical wastewater. Environ Sci Technol 2006;40:3971-7.
Manni G, Caron F. Calibration and determination of volatile fatty acids in waste leachates by gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1995;690:237-42.
Adorno MA, Hirasawa JS, Varesche MB. Development and validation of two methods to quantify volatile acids (C2-C6) by GC/FID: Headspace (automatic and manual) and liquid-liquid extraction (LLE). Am J Anal Chem 2014;5:406.
Lee HS, Rittmann BE. Evaluation of metabolism using stoichiometry in fermentative biohydrogen. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009;102:749-58.
Lee HS, Salerno MB, Rittmann BE. Thermodynamic evaluation on H2 production in glucose fermentation. Environ Sci Technol 2008;42:2401-7.
Rittmann BE, McCarty PL. Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
Van Ginkel SW, Oh SE, Logan BE. Biohydrogen gas production from food processing anddomestic wastewaters. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2005;30:1535-42.
Lee HS, Krajmalinik-Brown R, Zhang H, Rittmann BE. An electron-flow model can predict complex redox reactions in mixed-culture fermentative bioH2: Microbial ecology evidence. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009;104:687-97.
Thauer RK, Jungermann K, Decker K. Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 1977;41:100-80. 23. Jones DT, Woods DR. Acetone-butanol fermentation revisited. Microbiol Rev 1986;50:484-524.
Ren N, Li J, Li B, Wang Y, Liu S. Biohydrogen production from molasses by anaerobic fermentation with a pilot-scale bioreactor system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006;31:2147-57.
Liu IC, Whang LM, Ren WJ, Lin PY. The effect of pH on the production of biohydrogen by clostridia: Thermodynamic and metabolic considerations. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011;36:439-49.
Adams CJ, Redmond MC, Valentine DL. Pure-culture growth of fermentative bacteria, facilitated by H2 removal: Bioenergetics and H2 production. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006;72:1079-85.
Shida GM, Sader LT, Cavalcante de Amorim EL, Sakamoto IK, Maintinguer SI, Saavedra NK, et al. Performance and composition of bacterial communities in anaerobic fluidized bed reactors for hydrogen production: Effects of organic loading rate and alkalinity. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012;37:16925-34.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
https://e-rasaneh.ir/Certificate/22728
ISSN : 2228-7477