Pediatric effective dose assessment for routine computed tomography examinations in Tehran, Iran

Atefeh Tahmasebzadeh, Asghar Maziyar, Reza Reiazi, Mojtaba Soltani Kermanshahi, Seyyed Hossein Mousavie Anijdan, Reza Paydar

DOI: 10.4103/jmss.jmss_115_21


Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effective dose (ED) for computed tomography (CT) examination in different age groups and medical exposure in pediatric imaging centers in Tehran, Iran. Methods: Imaging data were collected from 532 pediatric patients from four age groups subjected to three prevalent procedures. National Cancer Institute CT (NCICT) software was used to calculate the ED value. Results: The mean ED values were 1.60, 4.16, and 10.56 mSv for patients' procedures of head, chest, and abdomen–pelvis, respectively. This study showed a significant difference of ED value among five pediatric medical imaging centers (P < 0.05). In head, chest, and abdomen–pelvis exams, a reduction in ED was evident with decreasing patients' age. Conclusion: As there were significant differences among ED values in five pediatric medical imaging centers, optimizing this value is necessary to decrease this variation. For head CT in infants and also abdomen–pelvis, further reduction in radiation exposure is required.


Computed tomography scan, effective radiation dose, National Cancer Institute CT (NCICT), pediatric

Full Text:



Foley SJ, McEntee MF, Rainford LA. Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in Ireland. Br J Radiol 2012;85:1390-7.

Dougeni E, Faulkner K, Panayiotakis G. A review of patient radiation radiation dose and optimisation methods in adultand paediatric CT scanning. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:e665-e83.

European Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Group, von Karsa L, Patnick J, Segnan N, Atkin W, Halloran S, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: Overview and introduction to the full supplement publication. Endoscopy 2013;45:51-9.

Rehani MM, Berry M. Radiation doses in computed tomography. The increasing doses of radiation need to be controlled. BMJ 2000;320:593-4.

Halliburton S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Dey D, Einstein AJ, Gentry R, George RT, et al. State-of-the-art in CT hardware and scan modes for cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012;6:154-63.

Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012;380:499-505.

Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Goergen SK, Byrnes GB, et al. Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: Data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 2013;346:f2360.

Huang WY, Muo CH, Lin CY, Jen YM, Yang MH, Lin JC, et al. Paediatric head CT scan and subsequent risk of malignancy and benign brain tumour: A nation-wide population-based cohort study. Br J Cancer 2014;110:2354-60.

Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol 2008;81:362-78.

American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Radiation Radiation Dose in CT: AAPM Report No. 96. College Park, MD: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2008.

ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1-332.

National Research Council. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.

Lee C, Kim KP, Bolch WE, Moroz BE, Folio L. NCICT: A computational solution to estimate organ doses for pediatric and adult patients undergoing CT scans. J Radiol Prot 2015;35:891-909.

Tahmasebzadeh A, Paydar R, Soltani Kermanshahi M, Maziar A, Rezaei M, Reiazi R. Pediatric Regional Drl Assessment in Common Ct Examinations for Medical Exposure Optimization in Tehran, Iran. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2020;192:341-9.

Deevband MR, Ghorbani M, Eshraghi A, Salimi Y, Saeedzadeh E, Kardan MR, et al. Patient effective radiation radiation dose estimation for routine computed tomography examinations in Iran. Int J Radiat Res 2021;19:63-73.

Huda W, Tipnis SV. Radiation radiation doses metrics and patientage in CT. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2016;168:374-80.

Boone JM, Cooper VN 3rd, Nemzek WR, McGahan JP, Seibert JA. Monte Carlo assessment of computed tomography radiation radiation dose to tissue adjacent to the scanned volume. Med Phys 2000;27:2393-407.

Yamazaki D, Miyazaki O, Takei Y, Matsubara K, Shinozaki M, Shimada Y, et al. Usefulness of size-specific dose estimates in pediatric computed tomography: Revalidation of large-scale pediatric CT dose survey data in Japan. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2018;179:254-62.

Rizzo S, Kalra M, Schmidt B, Dalal T, Suess C, Flohr T, et al. Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:673-9.

Russell MT, Fink JR, Rebeles F, Kanal K, Ramos M, Anzai Y. Balancing radiation dose and image quality: Clinical applications of neck volume CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:727-31.

Suliman II, Khamis HM, Ombada TH, Alzimami K, Alkhorayef M, Sulieman A. Radiation exposure during paediatric CT in Sudan: CT dose, organ and effective doses. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2015;167:513-8.

Khatonabadi M, Kim HJ, Lu P, McMillan KL, Cagnon CH, DeMarco JJ, et al. The feasibility of a regional CTDIvol to estimate organ dose from tube current modulated CT exams. Med Phys 2013;40:051903.

Schlattl H, Zankl M, Becker J, Hoeschen C. Dose conversion coefficients for paediatric CT examinations with automatic tube current modulation. Phys Med Biol 2012;57:6309-26. 23

Papadakis AE, Perisinakis K, Damilakis J. Development of a method to estimate organ radiation radiation doses for pediatric CT examinations. Med Phys 2016; 43:2108.

Pathe C, Eble K, Schmitz-Beuting D, Keil B, Kaestner B, Voelker M, et al. The presence of iodinated contrast agents amplifies DNA radiation damage in computed tomography. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2011;6:507-13.

Kuefner MA, Brand M, Engert C, Schwab SA, Uder M. Radiation induced DNA double-strand breaks in radiology. Rofo 2015;187:872-8.

Jost G, Golfier S, Pietsch H, Lengsfeld P, Voth M, Schmid TE, et al. The influence of X-ray contrast agents in computed tomography on the induction of dicentrics and gamma-H2AX foci in lymphocytes of human blood samples. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:6029-39.

Ippolito D, Talei Franzesi C, Fior D, Bonaffini PA, Minutolo O, Sironi S. Low kV settings CT angiography (CTA) with low radiation radiation dose contrast medium volume protocol in the assessment of thoracic and abdominal aorta disease: A feasibility study. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20140140.


  • There are currently no refbacks.