Evaluation of annual staff doses and radiation shielding efficiencies of thyroid shield and lead apron during preparation and administration of 131I, 81Kr, and 99mTc-Labeled radiopharmaceuticals

Nayereh Khalili, Seyed Salman Zakariaee, Elahe Jazayeri Gharebaghi, Yalda Salehi, Vahid Changizi

DOI: 10.4103/jmss.JMSS_45_20

Abstract


Nuclear medicine technicians would receive unavoidable exposures during the preparation and administration of radiopharmaceuticals. Based on the staff dose monitoring, the dose reduction efficiencies of the radiation protection shields and the need to implement additional strategies to reduce the staff doses could be evaluated. In this study, medical staff doses during the preparation and administration of Tc-99 m, I-131, and Kr-81 radiopharmaceuticals were evaluated. The dose reduction efficiencies of the lead apron and thyroid shield were also investigated. GR-207 thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) chips were used for quantifying the medical staff doses. The occupational dose magnitudes were determined in five organs at risk including eye lens, thyroid, fingers, chest, and gonads. TLDs were located under and over the protective shields for evaluating the dose reduction efficiencies of the lead apron and thyroid shield. The occupational doses were normalized to the activities used in the working shifts. During preparation and injection of Tc-99 m radiopharmaceutical, the average annual doses were higher in the chest (4.49 mGy) and eye lenses (4 mGy). For I-131 radiopharmaceutical, the average annual doses of the point-finger (15.8 mGy) and eye lenses (1.23 mGy) were significantly higher than other organs. During the preparation and administration of Kr-81, the average annual doses of the point-finger (0.65 mGy) and chest (0.44 mGy) were higher. The significant dose reductions were achieved using the lead apron and thyroid shield. The radiation protection shields and minimum contact with the radioactive sources, including patients, are recommended to reduce the staff doses.

Keywords


Annual staff doses, lead apron, nuclear medicine, occupational dose, thermoluminescent dosimeter, thyroid shield

Full Text:

PDF

References


Khan FM, Gibbons JP. Khan's the Physics of Radiation Therapy. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2014.

Early PJ, Sodee DB. Principles and Practice of Nuclear Medicine. Maryland Heights, Missouri, United States: Mosby Incorporated; 1995.

Ahasan M. Assessment of Radiation dose in Nuclear Medicine Hot Lab. Int J Radiat Res 2004;2:75-78.

Al-Haj AN, Lagarde CS. Statistical analysis of historical occupational dose records at a large medical center. Health Phys 2002;83:854-60.

Weizhang W, Wenyi Z, Ronglin C, Liang'an Z. Occupational exposures of Chinese medical radiation workers in 1986–2000. Radiat Prot Dosim 2005;117:440-3.

Nassef M, Kinsara A. Occupational radiation dose for medical workers at a University Hospital. J Taibah Univ Sci 2017;11:1259-66.

Laboratory Design and Construction- PART 1: General Requirements. Homebush, New South Wales, Australia and Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand: Australian/New Zealand Standard; 1997. p. 89-95.

Steyn PF, Uhrig J. The role of protective lead clothing in reducing radiation exposure rates to personnel during equine bone scintigraphy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005;46:529-32.

Murphy PH, Wu Y, Glaze SA. Attenuation properties of lead composite aprons. Radiology 1993;186:269-72.

Young AM. Dose rates in nuclear medicine and the effectiveness of lead aprons: Updating the department's knowledge on old and new procedures. Nucl Med Commun 2013;34:254-64.

He X, Zhao R, Rong L, Yao K, Chen S, Wei B. Answers to if the lead aprons are really helpful in nuclear medicine from the perspective of spectroscopy. Radiat Prot Dosim 2017;174:558-64.

Fog LS, Collins P. Monte Carlo simulation of the dose to nuclear medicine staff wearing protective garments. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2008;31:307-16.

Cool DA, Peterson Jr HT. Standards for Protection Against Radiation, 10 CFR Part 20. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1991.

Al-Abdulsalam A, Brindhaban A. Occupational radiation exposure among the staff of departments of nuclear medicine and diagnostic radiology in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 2014;23:129-33.

Ranogajec-Komor M. Thermoluminescencedosimetry-application in environmental monitoring. Radiat Saf Manag 2003;2:2-16.

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation- Volume 1 : UNSCEAR 2000 report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. New York: United Nations Publication; 2000.

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation - Volume 1 : UNSCEAR 2008 report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. New York: United Nations Publication; 2010.

Samerdokiene V, Atkocius V, Kurtinaitis J, Valuckas KP. Occupational exposure of medical radiation workers in Lithuania, 1950-2003. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008;130:239-43.

Ahmad M, Ahmad H, Khattak MR, Shah KA, Shaheen W, Shah JA, et al. Assessment of occupational exposure to external radiation among workers at the institute of radiotherapy and nuclear medicine, Pakistan (2009-2016). Iran J Med Phys 2017;14:197-202.

Jabeen A, Munir M, Khalil A, Masood M, Akhter P. Occupational exposure from external radiation used in medical practices in Pakistan by film badge dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosim 2010;140:396-401.

Martins M, Alves J, Abrantes J, Roda A. Occupational exposure in nuclear medicine in Portugal in the 1999–2003 period. Radiat Prot Dosim 2007;125:130-4.

Brudecki K, Kowalska A, Zagrodzki P, Szczodry A, Mroz T, Janowski P, et al. Measurement of 131 I activity in thyroid of nuclear medical staff and internal dose assessment in a Polish nuclear medical hospital. Radiat Environ Biophys 2017;56:19-26.

Mosley S, Currie G. Personal dosimeter use in Australian nuclear medicine practice. Internet J Nucl Med 2007;4:201-6.

Sani GK, Momennezhad M, Zakavi S, Sabzevari S. Effect of lead aprons on decreasing the dose received by personal in nuclear medicine departments. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2008;10:30-4.

Huda W, Boutcher S. Should nuclear medicine technologists wear lead aprons? J Nucl Med Technol 1989;17:6-11.

Hejazi P, Sohrabi M. Staff radiation doses associated with nuclear procedures and efficacy of syringe shield for reduction dose. Koomesh 2001;2:117-22.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

  https://e-rasaneh.ir/Certificate/22728

https://e-rasaneh.ir/

ISSN : 2228-7477