ICA-Based Imagined Conceptual Words Classification on EEG Signals

Ehsan Imani, Ali Pourmohammad, Mahsa Bagheri, Vida Mobasheri

DOI:

Abstract


Independent component analysis (ICA) has been used for detecting and removing the eye artifactsconventionally. However, in this research, it was used not only for detecting the eye artifacts, but also fordetecting the brain-produced signals of two conceptual danger and information category words. In thiscross-sectional research, electroencephalography (EEG) signals were recorded using Micromed and 19-channel helmet devices in unipolar mode, wherein Cz electrode was selected as the reference electrode.In the first part of this research, the statistical community test case included four men and four women,who were 25–30 years old. In the designed task, three groups of traffic signs were considered, in whichtwo groups referred to the concept of danger, and the third one referred to the concept of information. Inthe second part, the three volunteers, two men and one woman, who had the best results, were chosenfrom among eight participants. In the second designed task, direction arrows (up, down, left, and right)were used. For the 2/8 volunteers in the rest times, very high-power alpha waves were observed from theback of the head; however, in the thinking times, they were different. According to this result, alphawaves for changing the task from thinking to rest condition took at least 3 s for the two volunteers, and itwas at most 5 s until they went to the absolute rest condition. For the 7/8 volunteers, the danger andinformation signals were well classified; these differences for the 5/8 volunteers were observed in theright hemisphere, and, for the other three volunteers, the differences were observed in the lefthemisphere. For the second task, simulations showed that the best classification accuracies resultedwhen the time window was 2.5 s. In addition, it also showed that the features of the autoregressive (AR)-15 model coefficients were the best choices for extracting the features. For all the states of neuralnetwork except hardlim discriminator function, the classification accuracies were almost the same andnot very different. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) in comparison with the neural network yieldedhigher classification accuracies. ICA is a suitable algorithm for recognizing of the word’s concept and itsplace in the brain. Achieved results from this experiment were the same compared with the results fromother methods such as functional magnetic resonance imaging and methods based on the brain signals(EEG) in the vowel imagination and covert speech. Herein, the highest classification accuracy wasobtained by extracting the target signal from the output of the ICA and extracting the features ofcoefficients AR model with time interval of 2.5 s. Finally, LDA resulted in the highest classificationaccuracy more than 60%.

Keywords


Artificial neural network (ANN); blind source separation (BSS); brain–computer interfaces (BCIs); electroencephalography signals (EEG signals); independent component analysis (ICA); linear discriminant analysis (LDA)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sanei S, Chambers JA. EEG Signal Processing. 2nd ed. UK: Centre of Digital Signal Processing, Cardiff University; 2007.

Woodman GF. A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention. Atten Percept Psychophys 2010;72:2031-46.

Petrantonakis PC, Hadjileontiadis LJ. Emotion recognition from EEG using higher order crossings. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2010;14:186-97.

Ribas GC. The Cerebral Sulci and Gyri. Brazil: Department of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo Medical School; 2010.

Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 11th ed. UK: Elsevier Health Sciences Publishers; 2006.

Petersen SE, Fox PT, Posner MI, Mintun M, Raichle ME. Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of singleword processing. Nature 1988;331:585-9.

Calliess JP. Further Investigations on Unspoken Speech-Findings in an Attempt of Developing EEG-Based Word Recognition. [MSc thesis]. Carnegie Mellon University; 2006.

Karunanayaka P, Schmithorst VJ, Vannest J, Szaflarski JP, Plante E, Holland SK. A linear structural equation model for covert verb generation based on independent component analysis of fMRI data from children and adolescents. Front Syst Neurosci 2011;5:29.

Palmer ED, Rosen HJ, Ojemann JG, Buckner RL, Kelley WM, Petersen SE. An event-related fMRI study of overt and covert word stem completion. Neuroimage 2001;14:182-93.

DaSalla CS, Kambara H, Sato M, Koike Y. Single-trial classification of vowel speech imagery using common spatial patterns. Neural Netw 2009;22:1334-9.

Deng S, Srinivasan R, Lappas T, DZmura M. EEG classification of imagined syllable rhythm using Hilbert spectrum methods. J Neural Eng 2010;7:046006.

de la Vega Arias J, Hintermuller C, Guger C. Generic brain computer interface for social and human–computer interaction. Proceeding of the Fifth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, Spain, 2012. p. 145-9.

Perez-Marcos D, Buitrago JA, Velásquez FD. Writing through a robot: A proof of concept for a brain-machine interface. Med Eng Phys 2011;33:1314-7.

Gentiletti GG, Gebhart JG, Acevedo RC, Yanez-Suarez O, Medina- Banuelos V. Command of a simulated wheelchair on a virtual environment using a brain-computer interface. IRBM 2009;30: 218-25.

Royer AS, Doud AJ, Rose ML, He B. EEG control of a virtual helicopter in 3-dimensional space using intelligent control strategies. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010;18:581-9.

Wu CH, Chang HC, Lee PL, Li KS, Sie JJ, Sun CW, et al. Frequency recognition in an SSVEP-based brain computer interface using empirical mode decomposition and refined generalized zero-crossing. J Neurosci Methods 2011;196:170-81.

Piccione F, Giorgi F, Tonin P, Priftis K, Giove S, Silvoni S, et al. P300-based brain computer interface: Reliability and performanc

in healthy and paralysed participants. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:531-7.

Li Y, Guan C, Li H, Chin Z. A self-training semi-supervised SVM algorithm and its application in an EEG-based brain computer interface speller system. Pattern Recognit Lett 2008;29:1285-94.

Sirvent Blasco JL, Ianez E, Ubeda A, Azorin J. Visual evoked potential-based brain-machine interface applications to assist disabled people. Expert Syst Appl 2012;39:7908-18.

Pfurtscheller GG, Neuper C, Schlogl A, Lugger K. Separability of EEG signals recorded during right and left motor imagery using adaptive autoregressive parameters. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1998;6:316-25.

Palaniappan R, Paramesran R, Nishida S, Saiwaki N. A new braincomputer interface design using fuzzy ARTMAP. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2002;10:140-8.

Ahangi A, KaramnejadM,MohammadiN,Ebrahimpour R,BagheriN. Multiple classifier systemforEEGsignal classificationwith application to brain-computer interfaces. Neural Comput Appl 2013;23:1319-27.

Webster JG. Medical Instrumentation. 3rd ed. New York: John- Wiley & Sons Inc.; 1998.

Amari SI, Cichocki A. Adaptive Blind Signal and Image Processing. New York: Wiley 2002.

Hyvarinen A, Karhunen J, Oja E. Independent Component Analysis. 1st ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 2001.

Tichavsky P, Koldovsky Z, Oja E. Performance analysis of the FastICA algorithm and Cramer-Rao bounds for linear independent component analysis. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2006;54:1189-203.

Gonzalez AR. EEG signal processing for BCI applications. Int J Hum Comput Syst 2012;51-73.

Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG. Pattern Classification. 2nd ed. UK: Wiley; 2000.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

  https://e-rasaneh.ir/Certificate/22728

https://e-rasaneh.ir/

ISSN : 2228-7477