Assessment and Comparison of Homogeneity and Conformity Indexes in Step-and-Shoot and Compensator-Based Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D CRT) in Prostate Cancer

Marzieh Salimi, Kaveh Shirani Tak Abi, Hassan Ali Nedaie, Hossein Hassani, Hussain Gharaati, Mahmood Samei, Rezgar Shahi, Hamed Zarei

DOI:

Abstract


Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) are two treatment modalities in prostate cancer, which provide acceptable dose distribution in tumor region with sparing the surrounding normal tissues. IMRT is based on inverse planning optimization; in which, intensity of beams is modified by using multileaf collimators and also compensators with optimum shapes in step and shoot (SAS) and compensator-based method, respectively. In the recent study, some important parameters were compared in two IMRT and 3D CRT methods. Prescribed dose was 80 Gy for both IMRT procedures and 70 Gy for 3D CRT. Treatment plans of 15 prostate cancer candidates were compared to target the minimum dose, maximum dose, V 76 Gy (for IMRT plans) V 66.5 Gy (for 3D CRT), mean dose, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI). Dose conformity in compensators-based IMRT was better than SAS and 3D CRT. The same outcome was also achieved for homogeneity index. The target coverage was achieved 95% of prescribed dose to 95% of planning target volume (PTV) in 3D CRT and 95% of prescribed dose to 98% of PTV in IMRT methods. IMRT increases maximum dose of tumor region, improves CI and HI of target volume, and also reduces dose of organs at risks.

Keywords


3D CRT; compensator; conformity index; homogeneity index; IMRT; step and shoot

Full Text:

PDF

References


Gronberg H. Prostate cancer epidemiology. Lancet 2003;361: 859-64.

Berger MF, Lawrence MS, Demichelis F, Drier Y, Cibulskis K, Sivachenko AY, et al. The genomic complexity of primary human prostate cancer. Nature 2011;470:214-20.

Feuvret L, Noel G, Mazeron JJ, Bey P. Conformity index: A review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;64:333-42.

Zelefsky MJ, Levin EJ, Hunt M, Yamada Y, Shippy AM, Jackson A, et al. Incidence of late rectal and urinary toxicities after threedimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;70:1124-9.

Senthi S, Gill SS, Haworth A, Kron T, Cramb J, Rolfo A, et al. Benchmarking dosimetric quality assessment of prostate intensitymodulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;82:998-1005.

Ling CC, Burman C, Chui CS, Kutcher GJ, Leibel SA, LoSasso T, et al. Conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer using inversely planned intensity-modulated photon beams produced with dynamic multileaf collimation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996;35:721-30.

Webb S. The Physics of Three Dimensional Radiation Therapy: Conformal Radiotherapy, Radiosurgery and Treatment Planning. CRC Press; 1993.

Luan S, Wang C, Chen DZ, Hu XS, Naqvi SA, Yu CX, et al. A new MLC segmentation algorithm/software for step-and-shoot IMRT delivery. Med Phys 2004;31:695-707.

International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon-Beam Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT): ICRU Report 83. 2010.

Morgan-Fletcher S. Prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy (supplement to ICRU Report 50), ICRU Report 62. ICRU, pp. ix+52, 1999 (ICRU Bethesda, MD). Br J Radiol 2001;74:294.

Tomita N, Kodaira T, Tachibana H, Nakamura T, Nakahara R, Inokuchi H, et al. A comparison of radiation treatment plans using IMRT with helical tomotherapy and 3D conformal radiotherapy for nasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Br J Radiol 2009;82:756-63.

Jabbari K, Azarmahd N, Babazade S, Amouheidari A. Optimizing of the tangential technique and supraclavicular fields in 3 dimensional conformal radiation therapy for breast cancer. J Med Signals Sens 2013;3:107.

Kataria T, Sharma K, Subramani V, Karrthick KP, Bisht SS. Homogeneity index: An objective tool for assessment of conformal radiation treatments. J Med Phys 2012;37:207.

Rosenwald J, Gaboriaud G, Pontvert D. Conformal radiotherapy: Principles and classification. Cancer Radiother 1998;3:367-77.

Jabbari K. Review of fast Monte Carlo codes for dose calculation in treatment planning. J Med Signals Sens 2011;1:73-86.

Knoos T, Kristensen I, Nilsson P. Volumetric and dosimetric evaluation of radiation treatment plans: Radiation conformity index. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;42:1169-76.

Fisher J, Scott C, Stevens R, Marconi B, Champion L, Freedman GM, et al. Randomized phase III study comparing Best Supportive Care to Biafine as a prophylactic agent for radiation-induced skin toxicity for women undergoing breast irradiation: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 97-13. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;48:1307-10.

Luxton G, Hancock SL, Boyer AL. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;59:267-84.

Moorthy S, Murthy N, Majumdar SK, El Hateer H, Mohan R, Ramanathan V. Dosimetric characteristics of IMRT versus 3DCRT for intact breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost. Austral Asian J Cancer 2012;11:221-30. ISSN 0972-2556.

Price S, Williams M, Butson M, Metcalfe P. Comparison of skin dose between conventional radiotherapy and IMRT. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2006;29:272-7.

Jabbari K, Amouheidari A, Babazadeh S. The quality control of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for ONCOR Siemens linear accelerators using film dosimetry. Iran J Med Phys 2012;9:111-25.

Hashemian A, Toossi MT, Nasseri S. Design and fabrication of the control part of a prototype multileaf collimator system. J Med Signals Sens 2014;4:300-4.

Ezzell GA, Galvin JM, Low D, Palta JR, Rosen I, Sharpe MB, et al. Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: Report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPMRadiationTherapyCommittee.Med Phys 2003;30:2089-115.

Ung N, Harper C, Wee L. Dosimetric impact of systematic MLC positional errors on step and shoot IMRT for prostate cancer: A planning study. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2011;34:291-8.

Bartrum T, Bailey M, Nelson V, Grace M. Linear attenuation coefficients for compensator based IMRT. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2007;30:281-7.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.