Effect of Treadmill Training Protocols on Locomotion Recovery in Spinalized Rats

Hamid R Kobravi, Ali Moghimi, Zahra Khodadadi

DOI:

Abstract


Both treadmill training and epidural stimulation can help to reactivate the central pattern generator (CPG) inthe spinal cord after a spinal cord injury. However, designing an appropriate training approach and astimulation profile is still a controversial issue. Since the spinal afferent signals are the input signals of CPGin the spinal cord, it can be concluded that the number of input afferent signals can affect the quality ofmovement recovery, such a phenomenon is in accordance with Hebbian theory. Therefore, at first in thispaper, through some simulation studies on a model of CPGs, the effective influence of increasing theafferent input weight onactivatingCPGmodel was certified. Then, the performance of twodifferent types oftreadmill training along with epidural stimulation was compared. The numbers of spinal afferents involvedduring each designed training approach were different. Experiments were conducted on two groups ofspinalized rats. Three quantized integer qualitative measures, with 0–2 scales, were envisioned to evaluatethe performance of training protocols. According to the experimental results, the assigned scales to the ratsusing the training approach involving more afferents, the rats have been creeping on a treadmill, was 2. Also,the assigned scales to the rats using the training approach involving less afferents, the rats have beenperforming bipedal locomotion, was 0 or 1. Such experimental results coincide with achieved simulationresults elucidating the effect of increasing the afferent input weights on activating CPG model.

Keywords


Animals; central pattern generators; dinucleoside phosphates locomotion; rats; spinal cord injuries; cytidylyl-3′-5′-guanosine

Full Text:

PDF

References


Young W. Spinal cord regeneration. Cell Transplant 2014;23:573-611.

Lu P, Blesch A, Graham L, Wang Y, Samara R, Banos K, et al. Motor axonal regeneration after partial and complete spinal cord transection. J Neurosci 2012;32:8208-18.

Orlovski G, Deliagina T, Grillner S. Neuronal Control of Locomotion. New York: Oxford University Press 1999.

Ichiyama RM, Gerasimenko YP, Zhong H, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Hindlimb stepping movements in complete spinal rats induced by epidural spinal cord stimulation. Neurosci Lett 2005;383:339-44.

Edgerton V, Harkema S. Epidural stimulation of the spinal cord in spinal cord injury: Current status and future challenges. Expert Rev Neurother 2011;11:1351-3.

Angeli C, Edgerton V, Gerasimenko Y, Harkema S. Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain 2014;137:1394-409.

Martinez M, Delivet-Mongrain H, Rossignol S. Treadmill training promotes spinal changes leading to locomotor recovery after partial spinal cord injury in cats. J Neurophysiol 2013;109:2909-22.

Akio S, Masaki Y. Design of a novel central pattern generator and the Hebbian motion leaning. 18th IEEE International Conference on Control Applications. Part of the 2009 IEEE Multi-conference on Systems and Control. St. Petersburg, Russia: IEEE; 2009. p. 1655-60.

Young W. Electrical stimulation and motor recovery. Cell Transplant 2015;24:429-46.

Markin SN, Klishko AN, Shevtsova NA, Lemay MA, Prilutsky BI, Rybak IA. Afferent control of locomotor CPG: Insights from a simple neuromechanical model. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010;1198:21-34.

Righetti L, Buchli J, Ijspeert AJ. From dynamic Hebbian learning for oscillators to adaptive central pattern generators. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Adaptive Motion in Animals and Machines- AMAM; 2005. p. 45.

Namvar M. Introduction of an Appropriate Surgery Procedure for Intraspinal Chronic Stimulation of Rats With Induced Spinal Cord Injury. Iran: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad; 2015.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

  https://e-rasaneh.ir/Certificate/22728

https://e-rasaneh.ir/

ISSN : 2228-7477